The SEC's May 29 guidance exempting certain proof-of-stake blockchains from securities registration has ignited a firestorm of criticism. Former SEC enforcement chief John Reed Stark lambasted the move as "a shameful abdication" of investor protection duties, noting it contradicts federal court rulings in cases against Binance and Coinbase. ——This policy reversal comes despite judges previously allowing claims that staking products qualified as securities——.
【Key Conflict】: The SEC's Corporation Finance Division now asserts some staking services may not constitute securities, directly opposing:
The SEC's recent actions form a pattern:
Crenshaw highlighted contradictions in the SEC's treatment of assets like ETH and SOL—deemed non-securities for registration but securities for product sales. "How is this logical?" she questioned in a June 2 statement. The debate exposes deeper tensions as the SEC attempts to reconcile:
As the SEC pivots toward lighter crypto oversight, exchanges face mounting uncertainty. ——The real casualty may be market stability——, with competing interpretations creating compliance minefields. With neither legislation nor clear precedent emerging, stakeholders brace for more turbulence in this $1.7 trillion sector.